Author: Albert Bertilsson
Date: 08:29:43 12/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2003 at 11:23:06, Slater Wold wrote: >On December 12, 2003 at 06:52:15, Albert Bertilsson wrote: > >>I've collected some info posted in the distributed perft thread. >> >>Using Sharper 0.17p to do perft calculations with hash table has given the >>following results: >> >><PRE> >>Hardware Hash CS Nodes MNPS >>Athlon XP (Barton) at real 2400MHz 256 51254 84998978956 165 >>P4 3.06Ghz 256 49801 84998978956 170 >>Athlon XP (Barton) at real 2400MHz 512 45422 84998978956 187 >>Athlon XP 2.5GHz, 200fsb(400DDR) with 3-4-4-10 512 43848 84998978956 193 >>Athlon XP (Barton) at real 2400MHz 1024 42027 84998978956 202 >></PRE> >> >>Single cpu machines counting 202 million nodes per second is really impressive. >> >>If you have a machine that you'd like to bench, download the distributed perft >>client (Sharper 0.17p is included with it). Set the hash size with "hashsize >>XXX" (XXX = number of megabytes of ram) and run "perfthash 8" and report the >>time it took to finnish the calculation. >> >>I'm going to add some lower spec. machines later. >> >>/Regards Albert > >Albert...you made a program that is faster on a P4 3.06Ghz than on the fastest >(XP) AMDs. > >People aren't going to like you. :D > >P4 3.06Ghz - 512MB HT: > >perfthash 8 = 43134cs That's actually quite strange because I've always noticed that Sharper runs better on AMD than Intel P4, and here it is the opposite. Still an AMD box is king of the hill (until we see a P4 with 1GB of RAM). /Regards Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.