Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 09:24:24 12/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
>>> >>><PRE> >>>Hardware Hash CS Nodes MNPS >>>Athlon XP (Barton) at real 2400MHz 256 51254 84998978956 165 >>>P4 3.06Ghz 256 49801 84998978956 170 >>>Athlon XP (Barton) at real 2400MHz 512 45422 84998978956 187 >>>Athlon XP 2.5GHz, 200fsb(400DDR) with 3-4-4-10 512 43848 84998978956 193 >>>Athlon XP (Barton) at real 2400MHz 1024 42027 84998978956 202 >>></pre> >>> >>>Single cpu machines counting 202 million nodes per second is really impressive. >>> >>>If you have a machine that you'd like to bench, download the distributed perft >>>client (Sharper 0.17p is included with it). Set the hash size with "hashsize >>>XXX" (XXX = number of megabytes of ram) and run "perfthash 8" and report the >>>time it took to finnish the calculation. >>> >>>I'm going to add some lower spec. machines later. >>> >>>/Regards Albert >> >>Albert...you made a program that is faster on a P4 3.06Ghz than on the fastest >>(XP) AMDs. >> >>People aren't going to like you. :D >> >>P4 3.06Ghz - 512MB HT: >> >>perfthash 8 = 43134cs > >That's actually quite strange because I've always noticed that Sharper runs >better on AMD than Intel P4, and here it is the opposite. Still an AMD box >is king of the hill (until we see a P4 with 1GB of RAM). > >/Regards Albert Hi ...but it is only 5% faster on a computer with 660 MHz more and 3 times the price for the CPU (okok only 2 times the price, I have to add my silent cooling!). My jealousy is limited in that case! :-) Bye Ingo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.