Author: James T. Walker
Date: 04:08:21 11/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 1998 at 03:38:31, Dan Kiski wrote: >On November 21, 1998 at 22:10:23, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >>Great Series of Games James, I bet most people would have thought Rebel 10 would >>have beaten CM5500. >> >>Now I am just waiting for the Rebel followers to come out and make some excuse >>for its loss. I like Rebel 10, I am not going to make excuses for it losing. But >>I know some people will. Lets just hope people take these games as they are. >>CM5500 giving a Rebel a Whipping :) >> >>Regards >> >>Micheal > >I agree great games, although Rebel 10 has some features that I like, I think >the only feature CM really lacks is infinate analysis. The result don't surprize I don't understand this statement. My CM5500 has infinite analysis as did my CM4000/CM5000. Frankly, the games when there was a win were interesting. Some of the draws between computers will drive you crazy. Sometimes the 50 move rule forces the program to do something different besides "wait" and then they win the game! I'm only a neophite chess player so take my opinions with a grain of salt. Jim Walker >me, I think if the pilz settings were used it would have been more like 8-4 >which is the result I got, with cm6000 pilz 8.5-3.5. > >I would like to see cm any w/pilz v junior 5, as I do not have Junior 5. >I can't wait for Fritz 5.32, (coupon in hand). > >Dan Kiski.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.