Author: Dan Kiski
Date: 04:43:06 11/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 1998 at 07:08:21, James T. Walker wrote: >On November 22, 1998 at 03:38:31, Dan Kiski wrote: > >>On November 21, 1998 at 22:10:23, Micheal Cummings wrote: >> >>>Great Series of Games James, I bet most people would have thought Rebel 10 would >>>have beaten CM5500. >>> >>>Now I am just waiting for the Rebel followers to come out and make some excuse >>>for its loss. I like Rebel 10, I am not going to make excuses for it losing. But >>>I know some people will. Lets just hope people take these games as they are. >>>CM5500 giving a Rebel a Whipping :) >>> >>>Regards >>> >>>Micheal >> >>I agree great games, although Rebel 10 has some features that I like, I think >>the only feature CM really lacks is infinate analysis. The result don't surprize > >I don't understand this statement. My CM5500 has infinite analysis as did my >CM4000/CM5000. Frankly, the games when there was a win were interesting. Some >of the draws between computers will drive you crazy. Sometimes the 50 move rule >forces the program to do something different besides "wait" and then they win >the game! I'm only a neophite chess player so take my opinions with a grain of >salt. >Jim Walker > > >>me, I think if the pilz settings were used it would have been more like 8-4 >>which is the result I got, with cm6000 pilz 8.5-3.5. >> >>I would like to see cm any w/pilz v junior 5, as I do not have Junior 5. >>I can't wait for Fritz 5.32, (coupon in hand). >> >>Dan Kiski. You must share with me how, when you have two single non computer players playing cm analysis can be obtained? Dan Kiski.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.