Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 02:18:05 12/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2003 at 04:53:57, Ed Schröder wrote: >On December 18, 2003 at 04:30:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On December 18, 2003 at 04:19:16, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On December 17, 2003 at 18:29:48, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>> >>>>On December 17, 2003 at 18:13:50, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>>> >>>>>Today (18/12/2003), but not tomorrow (19/12/2003)? >>>>> >>>>>Pure nonsense Frank. >>>>> >>>>>How do you know what me, Ed, or Johan De Koning, or the other >>>>>strong amateurs have been up to anyway? Mindreading? >>>>> >>>>>I guess it's possible that Ruffian 2.0 is the strongest WinBoard >>>>>engine but I know that any statement from you is to be taken with >>>>>a few kilos of salt, and I wouldn't believe such a statement from >>>>>anyone anyway without objective evidence. >>>>> >>>>>I only see WBEC so far where Ruffian 2.0 is a having problems >>>>>keeping the way older Deep Sjeng 1.5 at bay. So I don't see >>>>>any signs of the gigantic improvement you claim either. >>>>> >>>>>I consider the claim insulting towards me and I'm amused >>>>>by the steel face with which you're now claiming *I* am rude. >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>GCP >>>> >>>>Hi Gian Carlo, >>>> >>>>the first: >>>> >>>>I am sure that you will not speak for other programmers, like the programmer of >>>>TheKing or Rebel. I like to see that you speak with your words in a discuss with >>>>myself. I am sure that you have friends, like Johan de Koning or Ed Schröder but >>>>for the moment you discuss with myself and it seems that you must learn not a >>>>little bit ... you must learn a lot of! >>> >>>:-) > >>>I think it is you Frank who must learn a lot. If a competitor has the intention >>>to harm you and take you to court you will most probably have to rewrite your >>>ad's, write rectifications, pay for the competitors lost turnover. > >>I must learn from your person? > >I was giving you some good and free advice Frank, I don't want to see a nice >initiative to go up in smoke by one overenthusiastic newbie action. > > >>A person which wrote on his webpage on the same day as we public the information >>on Gambit-Soft News Ticker that Gandalf 4.32h (WinBoard Edition II) is available >>that Gandalf 5 is available by Lokasoft? > >The logic escapes me, it seems you are angry at the wrong person. > > > >>You are sure what you wrote here Ed? > >Yes Frank. > > >>Sorry, but I am honest and don't like it to see such information! >>And I will not learn from such things! > >Well lucky you, I am not out there to get you. > >My best, > >Ed Hi Ed, you know that I am very disappointed about your text on your own webpage about Gandalf 5 on the same day as we wrote that Gandalf 4.32h is available on Gambit-Soft News Ticker. I will never forget it because Gandalf is my favorite program and I spent a lot of energy in this project in order from Gambit-Soft. Not to do with the wrong things from Gambit-Soft, only with my wrok in order of Gambit-Soft. Ed, I have no other information and I am sure that the text on my handbook is right. The handbook is now 4 weeks available on Arena webpages and I cann't understand why on the day as I wrote the program is now available comes this discuss. You understand what I mean? I am sure that I have changed the text if I got this information to an other time because I have not interest to get problems with other firms which try to make over years a good work, like Lokasoft! But I am sure with my words and within is the text right! Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.