Author: James T. Walker
Date: 04:38:52 11/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 23, 1998 at 21:02:18, blass uri wrote: > >On November 23, 1998 at 20:49:22, blass uri wrote: > > >>Hello James >> >>57...Qg3 and if 58.Re8+ Kh7 59.Qd3+ g6 60.hxg6+ Kg7 and now 61.Rg8+ Kxg8 >>62.gxf7+Rxf7 63.Qd8+ Kg7 64.Qd4+ Kg6 65.Qe4+Kf6 is good for black because the >>white bishop cannot move and help in the perpetual check. >> >>Junior5 prefers 61.Qxf3 but it is of course losing > >I meant it prefers 61.Kd2(losing to 61...Qxf3 62.Qxf3) > >Uri >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Uri, I checked out the moves and I think you are right! In any case the original game was interesting and I thought Junior 5.0 should have won. I like Junior 5 style of play. It seems to have a nice blend of Positional/Tactical abilities. I don't understand why the depth indicator was made the way it is. It apparently means nothing to anyone except the programmer. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.