Author: blass uri
Date: 04:51:23 11/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 1998 at 07:38:52, James T. Walker wrote: >On November 23, 1998 at 21:02:18, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On November 23, 1998 at 20:49:22, blass uri wrote: >> >> >>>Hello James >>> >>>57...Qg3 and if 58.Re8+ Kh7 59.Qd3+ g6 60.hxg6+ Kg7 and now 61.Rg8+ Kxg8 >>>62.gxf7+Rxf7 63.Qd8+ Kg7 64.Qd4+ Kg6 65.Qe4+Kf6 is good for black because the >>>white bishop cannot move and help in the perpetual check. >>> >>>Junior5 prefers 61.Qxf3 but it is of course losing >> >>I meant it prefers 61.Kd2(losing to 61...Qxf3 62.Qxf3) >> >>Uri >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Hello Uri, >I checked out the moves and I think you are right! Junior agrees but needs some hours on my pentium200MMX to find Qg3 In any case the original >game was interesting and I thought Junior 5.0 should have won. I like Junior 5 >style of play. It seems to have a nice blend of Positional/Tactical abilities. >I don't understand why the depth indicator was made the way it is. It >apparently means nothing to anyone except the programmer. >Jim If you divide the depth by 2 you get the full septh search of Junior5 if you multiply the depth of Junior by 2 you get the length of the longest lines that Junior may consider. I also found that Junior could probably win later by 61...Rg6 62.Qe5 b1N+ 63.Kd3(or 63.Kc2 Na3+ 64.Kb3 Qb1+ 65.Qb2 Qxb2+) 63...Bf1+ 64.Kc2 Qf2+ 65.Be2 Qxe2+ Junior has no chance to see this line because Junior does not consider underpromotions and cannot find b1N+ Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.