Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 08:10:37 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 10:28:26, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On January 27, 2004 at 07:11:46, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>More importantly though, questions were asked but not answered. >>To me that raises the doubt. > >The question is if they had legitimate reasons for asking questions. Who ever needed a legitimate reason for asking questions? If you don't like questions, maybe that's because you have something to hide? :) But for the record: nobody ever said it _was_ a clone, the disqualifaction was a direct result of zero cooperation. >I haven't >seen anything to suggest that as yet. The inability to bend over voluntarily >doesn't constitute guilt IMO ;-). Well, I find it a bit strange that a programmer who has spent hundreds of hours on a program won't spend a few hours to answer some simple questions that could resolve this matter once and for all. I don't think this is one of those things that go away if you just ignore it. Once the cat is out of the bag you have to deal with it. -S. >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.