Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: JUNIOR 5.0 vs CM6000

Author: Ralph E. Carter

Date: 15:32:37 12/02/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 02, 1998 at 13:44:08, James T. Walker wrote:

>On December 02, 1998 at 13:32:15, Joe T. Pangilinan wrote:
>
>> Is the CM6000 set to Pilz setting to give it the maximum strength or the
>>default CM setting?
>
>Hello Joe,
>It is set to the default settings with the exception of setting the hash table
>size to "26"  which I believe is 64 meg of hash tables.  I have seen no "Proof"
>of the Pilz settings working with CM6000.  Since it's pretty new I haven't heard
>of anyone proving that the default settings are not the best.  I'll go with the
>programmer untill someone can prove different.
>Jim Walker

Mark Young played some matches against Fritz 5, with and without Pilz/Faber. The
results were convincing enough for me.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.