Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: JUNIOR 5.0 vs CM6000

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 10:44:08 12/02/98

Go up one level in this thread

On December 02, 1998 at 13:32:15, Joe T. Pangilinan wrote:

> Is the CM6000 set to Pilz setting to give it the maximum strength or the
>default CM setting?

Hello Joe,
It is set to the default settings with the exception of setting the hash table
size to "26"  which I believe is 64 meg of hash tables.  I have seen no "Proof"
of the Pilz settings working with CM6000.  Since it's pretty new I haven't heard
of anyone proving that the default settings are not the best.  I'll go with the
programmer untill someone can prove different.
Jim Walker

• Re: JUNIOR 5.0 vs CM6000 Ralph E. Carter 15:32:37 12/02/98
• Re: JUNIOR 5.0 vs CM6000 Dan Kiski 13:05:53 12/02/98
  • Re: JUNIOR 5.0 vs CM6000 James T. Walker 16:38:42 12/03/98
  • Re: JUNIOR 5.0 vs CM6000 Micheal Cummings 16:30:14 12/02/98

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.