Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:01:05 02/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2004 at 13:44:15, m.d.hurd wrote: >On February 07, 2004 at 12:55:20, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>Fritz 8 (8.0.0.8) seems to be real Angstgegner for Shredder 8. I played 20 games >>match >>with SEE opening positions. PC is P4 2,4 Ghz, level 60/15, hash 128MB, ponder >>and learning >>disabled. The score was one of most stunning for me ever: >> >> 60/15m SEE >>Fritz 8 111111½11½½½111½½½1½ 16.0/20 >>Shredder 8 000000½00½½½000½½½0½ 4.0/20 >> >>When looking for games nps and depth were OK for Shredder 8 no problem anywere. >>What's the probabilty for this kind of result, when S8 and F8 are quite equal >>in strength? >> >>JOuni > > >Hi Jouni > >I just ran a similar match with Shredder 8 gambit against Deep Fritz 8. Nunn >openings 128 mb hash each engine, game in 15 mins. Learn file set as read only. > >ATHLON2400XP, Blitz:15' 0 > > 12345678901234567890 >1 Shredder 8 Gambit 2750 1½1110111010111½00½1 13.5/20 >2 Deep Fritz 8 2700 0½0001000101000½11½0 6.5/20 > >Just to make certain I ran another set of games with exactly the same >conditions. > >ATHLON2400XP, Blitz:15' 0 > > 12345678901234567890 >1 Shredder 8 Gambit 2750 1½111010½0½0½11½0001 10.5/20 >2 Deep Fritz 8 2700 0½000101½1½1½00½1110 9.5/20 > >I expected the score to be more or less the same, however they are not. I guess >there must be some sort of random factor. I am not sure if there was a random factor. It is also possible that Deep Fritz learned from the games of the first match. I see that it got better result in games 8,9,11,13,19 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.