Author: martin fierz
Date: 08:27:19 02/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2004 at 09:21:59, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] >Hsu's rating is irrelevant for discussion about this position. hi uri, i disagree with you here. if hsu writes... "The published annotation gives 12. Bg5 Bg5 13. o-o as +=, but white could play 13. h3 instead and white appears to have a simple positional squeeze. " ...then his rating is not irrelevant. i didn't even look at that position, and i have no idea whether his statement is true or not. but i certainly wouldn't believe that kind of statement coming from an average 1600 player. if he had some GM telling him this, fine. but if not, then his rating is relevant... cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.