Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:42:01 02/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2004 at 11:27:19, martin fierz wrote: >On February 09, 2004 at 09:21:59, Uri Blass wrote: > >[snip] > >>Hsu's rating is irrelevant for discussion about this position. > >hi uri, > >i disagree with you here. if hsu writes... > >"The published annotation gives 12. Bg5 Bg5 13. o-o as >+=, but white could play 13. h3 instead and white appears to have a simple >positional squeeze. " > >...then his rating is not irrelevant. i didn't even look at that position, and i >have no idea whether his statement is true or not. but i certainly wouldn't >believe that kind of statement coming from an average 1600 player. if he had >some GM telling him this, fine. but if not, then his rating is relevant... > >cheers > martin Vincent claimed that Ng5 was the right move. A claim like that needs to be justified by chess reasons and not by saying that we cannot trust the opinion of Hsu. Note that I almost did not look at the position so I did not express an opinion. My opinion was do not know before and after the post of vincent. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.