Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:51:47 02/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2004 at 09:21:59, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 09, 2004 at 08:39:31, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On February 08, 2004 at 22:50:05, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>If case you have not figured this out by now, my intent it to continue with >>>posting all 11 of the Nolot positions, dig up the game score from the actual >>>game -- post the orginal comments made by Pierre Nolot (original author of the >>>article where these positions were discussed) and Feng-Hsiung Hsu, Deep Blue >>>Inventor, who was preparing Deep Thought/Deep Blue for the match with Kasparov >>>that was to come in 1995 and took a keen interest in these positions. He >>>believed that if Deep Blue were able to solve these type of positions quickly, >>>Deep Blue would have a very good shot at defeating Kasparov. It is interesting >>>to see what today's software on fast hardware think of these positions. >>> >>>So far these posts have gone very well and I appeciate everyone who has >>>particpated in this excercise. >>> >>>Nolot #3 is a semi-controversial position as there are many doubters that the >>>claimed winning move is truly a forced win. When one also considers the nearly >>>200 point in the ratings of the particpants, it easier to understand why the >>>favored player, GM Sergey Smagin, now 47, played the daring and very complicated >> >>[d]r2qk2r/ppp1b1pp/2n1p3/3pP1n1/3P2b1/2PB1NN1/PP4PP/R1BQK2R w - - bm Nxg5; 3 >>f3g5 >> >>I have studied it too and came to the conclusion that Nxg5 is a beautiful and >>very deep win. Nothing controversial about it. >> >>Please realise Feng-Hsiung Hsu has a rating of a 1000 points or so and his thing >>positional 2000 or so. He doesn't realize of course that black effectively is >>not playing after Nxg5. > >Hsu's rating is irrelevant for discussion about this position. Proof me that it is irrelevant. The only proof we have is that 2400+ rated engines when you start using them for your correspondence games that they achieve 2000 rating. So if there is any proof here it is that your influence is a very bad one for the game of chess!! >I did not study this position but these kind of posts is the reason that people >do not like you. So you didn't even study it. You are a @#(@#(!(!. You comment on something without even having studied it. I spent a full day to this position some years ago! It is a beautiful sacrafice. Knowing that your analysis are 2000 rating, thanks to your brains managing to bring down the level of engines, i suggest you take 2 weeks. >You could claim that you believe that Nxg5 is better without becoming personal >against Hsu but unfortunately instead of comparing evaluation of positions after >Nxg5 and Bxg5 you chose to go for a personal attack. >Uri If you feel that a person is worth less when his chess rating is lower then that is your interpretation. Perhaps i don't even need to throw you from that 10 story hotel in Tel Aviv; you will jump yourself knowing your interpretation is that you failed in live because you have a bad chess level!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.