Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:07:27 02/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2004 at 13:51:47, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 09, 2004 at 09:21:59, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 09, 2004 at 08:39:31, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On February 08, 2004 at 22:50:05, Mike Byrne wrote: >>> >>>>If case you have not figured this out by now, my intent it to continue with >>>>posting all 11 of the Nolot positions, dig up the game score from the actual >>>>game -- post the orginal comments made by Pierre Nolot (original author of the >>>>article where these positions were discussed) and Feng-Hsiung Hsu, Deep Blue >>>>Inventor, who was preparing Deep Thought/Deep Blue for the match with Kasparov >>>>that was to come in 1995 and took a keen interest in these positions. He >>>>believed that if Deep Blue were able to solve these type of positions quickly, >>>>Deep Blue would have a very good shot at defeating Kasparov. It is interesting >>>>to see what today's software on fast hardware think of these positions. >>>> >>>>So far these posts have gone very well and I appeciate everyone who has >>>>particpated in this excercise. >>>> >>>>Nolot #3 is a semi-controversial position as there are many doubters that the >>>>claimed winning move is truly a forced win. When one also considers the nearly >>>>200 point in the ratings of the particpants, it easier to understand why the >>>>favored player, GM Sergey Smagin, now 47, played the daring and very complicated >>> >>>[d]r2qk2r/ppp1b1pp/2n1p3/3pP1n1/3P2b1/2PB1NN1/PP4PP/R1BQK2R w - - bm Nxg5; 3 >>>f3g5 >>> >>>I have studied it too and came to the conclusion that Nxg5 is a beautiful and >>>very deep win. Nothing controversial about it. >>> >>>Please realise Feng-Hsiung Hsu has a rating of a 1000 points or so and his thing >>>positional 2000 or so. He doesn't realize of course that black effectively is >>>not playing after Nxg5. >> >>Hsu's rating is irrelevant for discussion about this position. > >Proof me that it is irrelevant. > >The only proof we have is that 2400+ rated engines when you start using them for >your correspondence games that they achieve 2000 rating. No We have no proof for that. Based on my experience in correspondence games they are clearly better than 2000 ICCF rating. > >So if there is any proof here it is that your influence is a very bad one for >the game of chess!! > >>I did not study this position but these kind of posts is the reason that people >>do not like you. > >So you didn't even study it. You are a @#(@#(!(!. > >You comment on something without even having studied it. I spent a full day to >this position some years ago! > >It is a beautiful sacrafice. > >Knowing that your analysis are 2000 rating, thanks to your brains managing to >bring down the level of engines, i suggest you take 2 weeks. > >>You could claim that you believe that Nxg5 is better without becoming personal >>against Hsu but unfortunately instead of comparing evaluation of positions after >>Nxg5 and Bxg5 you chose to go for a personal attack. >>Uri > >If you feel that a person is worth less when his chess rating is lower then that >is your interpretation. Perhaps i don't even need to throw you from that 10 >story hotel in Tel Aviv; you will jump yourself knowing your interpretation is >that you failed in live because you have a bad chess level! I only see that you talked about Hsu and not about the position. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.