Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:05:21 02/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2004 at 04:34:02, Ingo Bauer wrote: >Hi > >>xSo,Fritz 8 - HYDRA,Hydra-1.02 (2652) [B52] >>Rated game, 10m + 10s Engine Room, 18.02.2004 >>[c morris] >> >>1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bb5+ Bd7 4.Bxd7+ Qxd7 5.0-0 Nc6 6.c3 Nf6 7.Re1 e6 8.d4 cxd4 >>9.cxd4 Be7 10.d5 Ne5 11.Nc3 0-0 12.Nxe5 dxe5 0.53/16 0 13.Bg5 Rad8 0.53/15 >> 11 14.Qc1 b5 0.37/14 22 15.Rd1 Qb7 0.44/15 37 16.a3 exd5 0.44/14 31 >> 17.Bxf6 Bxf6 0.44/16 35 18.Nxd5 Bh4 0.47/15 29 19.Qe3 Rc8 0.46/14 30 >> 20.Qh3 Bg5 0.42/15 0 21.Qf5 f6 0.37/15 0 22.b4 Rc2 0.06/13 26 23.a4 >>bxa4 0.11/14 8 24.Rxa4 Rfc8 0.14/13 30 25.h3 Kh8 0.48/13 1:04 >>26.Rda1 Ra8 0.60/13 42 27.Qe6 h6 0.51/13 26 28.R4a2 Rc6 0.80/14 26 >>29.Qg4 Rc4 0.74/14 28 30.Ra6 Rc6 0.72/13 28 31.Rxc6 Qxc6 0.94/16 0 >>32.h4 Bc1 1.17/16 0 33.Ra5 Qc2 1.66/15 42 34.Rc5 Qd2 1.66/15 23 >>35.g3 Bb2 1.67/15 30 36.Rc7 Rg8 2.14/15 39 37.Nxf6 gxf6 2.39/15 24 >>38.Qf5 Rxg3+ 2.46/15 18 39.Kh2 Rg6 2.77/16 33 40.h5 Qd8 3.09/16 38 >>41.Rc8 Qxc8 3.22/17 13 42.Qxc8+ Rg8 3.45/17 20 43.Qa6 Rf8 3.45/16 16 >>44.Qxa7 Bd4 4.35/15 18 45.Qe7 Kg8 4.53/16 19 46.b5 Bxf2 4.61/15 12 >>47.b6 Bxb6 4.93/16 3 48.Qe6+ Kg7 5.57/19 24 49.Qxb6 Kf7 5.57/17 15 >>50.Qd6 Re8 5.66/16 11 51.Qd7+ Re7 5.72/17 28 52.Qf5 Re8 6.84/15 17 >>53.Qg6+ Ke7 8.98/16 25 54.Qxh6 Ke6 9.61/15 18 55.Qg6 Rb8 13.26/14 13 >>56.h6 Rb2+ 17.31/13 19 57.Kg3 Rb3+ 27.61/14 30 58.Kg4 Rb1 71.42/13 14 >> 59.Qe8+ Kd6 71.42/12 0 60.h7 Rg1+ 71.48/13 20 61.Kf5 Rf1+ 71.49/11 >>20 62.Kg6 Rg1+ 71.51/12 9 63.Kxf6 Rf1+ 71.51/13 13 64.Kg7 Rg1+ >>71.53/14 7 65.Qg6+ Rxg6+ 66.Kxg6 71.55/18 0 Kc5 #11/1 0 67.h8Q Kd4 >>68.Kf5 #10/1 0 Kc4 69.Qxe5 #8/1 0 Kb4 70.Qd5 #7/1 0 Kc3 71.Ke5 >>#7/1 0 Kc2 72.Kd4 #6/1 0 Kb2 73.e5 #5/1 0 Kb1 74.Kc3 #3/1 0 Ka1 >>75.Kb3 #3/1 0 Kb1 76.Qh1# (Lag: Av=0.52s, max=0.9s) #2/1 0 1-0 >> >>Mind you I only have single cpu (Athlon XP 2700+) and this was without tweaks to >>Fritz8. Crafty would crush Hydra in tournament (IMHO) >> >>2r4k/pq4pp/5p2/3NpQb1/RP2P3/7P/2r2PP1/R5K1 b - - 0 26 >>wKg1,Qf5,Nd5,Ra1,a4,Pb4,e4,f2,g2,h3/bKh8,Qb7,Bg5,Rc2,c8,Pa7,e5,f6,g7,h7 > >Was it the 4Dual/8Cards Hydra or the opening developing Hydra with one card on a > single Athlon XP. (Forget what you see on the chessbase server, you never know >for sure what is really playing - Hydra8 to Hydra1, Beta, opening preperation >test ...!) > >Ingo It isn't important whether it's 4 or 8 cpu's there. it takes 5 seconds for the cards to start working. So it does never compare to how it plays in say 60 in 2. Further it is the case that its hyper agressive play will only be good in certain openings which they most likely won't show at the internet. I am very annoyed by the people laughing loud for hydra at the internet. Let them show up at a tournament instead of post nonsense here. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.