Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:05:20 02/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2004 at 08:05:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 18, 2004 at 04:34:02, Ingo Bauer wrote: > >>Hi >> >>>xSo,Fritz 8 - HYDRA,Hydra-1.02 (2652) [B52] >>>Rated game, 10m + 10s Engine Room, 18.02.2004 >>>[c morris] >>> >>>1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bb5+ Bd7 4.Bxd7+ Qxd7 5.0-0 Nc6 6.c3 Nf6 7.Re1 e6 8.d4 cxd4 >>>9.cxd4 Be7 10.d5 Ne5 11.Nc3 0-0 12.Nxe5 dxe5 0.53/16 0 13.Bg5 Rad8 0.53/15 >>> 11 14.Qc1 b5 0.37/14 22 15.Rd1 Qb7 0.44/15 37 16.a3 exd5 0.44/14 31 >>> 17.Bxf6 Bxf6 0.44/16 35 18.Nxd5 Bh4 0.47/15 29 19.Qe3 Rc8 0.46/14 30 >>> 20.Qh3 Bg5 0.42/15 0 21.Qf5 f6 0.37/15 0 22.b4 Rc2 0.06/13 26 23.a4 >>>bxa4 0.11/14 8 24.Rxa4 Rfc8 0.14/13 30 25.h3 Kh8 0.48/13 1:04 >>>26.Rda1 Ra8 0.60/13 42 27.Qe6 h6 0.51/13 26 28.R4a2 Rc6 0.80/14 26 >>>29.Qg4 Rc4 0.74/14 28 30.Ra6 Rc6 0.72/13 28 31.Rxc6 Qxc6 0.94/16 0 >>>32.h4 Bc1 1.17/16 0 33.Ra5 Qc2 1.66/15 42 34.Rc5 Qd2 1.66/15 23 >>>35.g3 Bb2 1.67/15 30 36.Rc7 Rg8 2.14/15 39 37.Nxf6 gxf6 2.39/15 24 >>>38.Qf5 Rxg3+ 2.46/15 18 39.Kh2 Rg6 2.77/16 33 40.h5 Qd8 3.09/16 38 >>>41.Rc8 Qxc8 3.22/17 13 42.Qxc8+ Rg8 3.45/17 20 43.Qa6 Rf8 3.45/16 16 >>>44.Qxa7 Bd4 4.35/15 18 45.Qe7 Kg8 4.53/16 19 46.b5 Bxf2 4.61/15 12 >>>47.b6 Bxb6 4.93/16 3 48.Qe6+ Kg7 5.57/19 24 49.Qxb6 Kf7 5.57/17 15 >>>50.Qd6 Re8 5.66/16 11 51.Qd7+ Re7 5.72/17 28 52.Qf5 Re8 6.84/15 17 >>>53.Qg6+ Ke7 8.98/16 25 54.Qxh6 Ke6 9.61/15 18 55.Qg6 Rb8 13.26/14 13 >>>56.h6 Rb2+ 17.31/13 19 57.Kg3 Rb3+ 27.61/14 30 58.Kg4 Rb1 71.42/13 14 >>> 59.Qe8+ Kd6 71.42/12 0 60.h7 Rg1+ 71.48/13 20 61.Kf5 Rf1+ 71.49/11 >>>20 62.Kg6 Rg1+ 71.51/12 9 63.Kxf6 Rf1+ 71.51/13 13 64.Kg7 Rg1+ >>>71.53/14 7 65.Qg6+ Rxg6+ 66.Kxg6 71.55/18 0 Kc5 #11/1 0 67.h8Q Kd4 >>>68.Kf5 #10/1 0 Kc4 69.Qxe5 #8/1 0 Kb4 70.Qd5 #7/1 0 Kc3 71.Ke5 >>>#7/1 0 Kc2 72.Kd4 #6/1 0 Kb2 73.e5 #5/1 0 Kb1 74.Kc3 #3/1 0 Ka1 >>>75.Kb3 #3/1 0 Kb1 76.Qh1# (Lag: Av=0.52s, max=0.9s) #2/1 0 1-0 >>> >>>Mind you I only have single cpu (Athlon XP 2700+) and this was without tweaks to >>>Fritz8. Crafty would crush Hydra in tournament (IMHO) >>> >>>2r4k/pq4pp/5p2/3NpQb1/RP2P3/7P/2r2PP1/R5K1 b - - 0 26 >>>wKg1,Qf5,Nd5,Ra1,a4,Pb4,e4,f2,g2,h3/bKh8,Qb7,Bg5,Rc2,c8,Pa7,e5,f6,g7,h7 >> >>Was it the 4Dual/8Cards Hydra or the opening developing Hydra with one card on a >> single Athlon XP. (Forget what you see on the chessbase server, you never know >>for sure what is really playing - Hydra8 to Hydra1, Beta, opening preperation >>test ...!) >> >>Ingo > >It isn't important whether it's 4 or 8 cpu's there. it takes 5 seconds for the >cards to start working. So it does never compare to how it plays in say 60 in 2. > >Further it is the case that its hyper agressive play will only be good in >certain openings which they most likely won't show at the internet. > >I am very annoyed by the people laughing loud for hydra at the internet. Let >them show up at a tournament instead of post nonsense here. > >Best regards, >Vincent Good advice. See you at CCT-7 perhaps? :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.