Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 03:00:42 12/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 1998 at 05:41:54, Dan Kiski wrote: >On December 08, 1998 at 04:28:10, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On December 08, 1998 at 04:14:59, Micheal Cummings wrote: >> >>>>>I played a series of 2 minute games in a tournament in CM6K, with the standard >>>>>settings and the Faber settings, and along with four other personalities, with a >>>>>few minor variations. I found that the CM6K standard settings won over the >>>>>second place personality by 6 points. The Faber settings personality came in >>>>>5/6. I was quit stunned. It was a 20 round tournament. >>>> >>>>Of course you can play with my settings again and again, but for the last time I >>>>make it public here: >>>> >>>>My Faber-settings ARE NOT GOOD for CM6000. >>>>They ARE GOOD for CM5X00 and probably CM4000. >>> >>> >I have played over 600 games using the faber\pilz settings on CM6000 against the >standard setting and other settings found on the web. In all my results that I >have posted here before the faber\pilz settings win clearly against all other >settings and also against other programs namely fritz 5.0, rebel 10 and CM5500. > >To say the faber/pilz settings don't work on CM6000 in my opinion just is not >correct. The settings beat all others endlessly. > >Computers used are two 233 mmx with 64 meg ram, CM 6000 settings at 16 meg hash. > >Dan Kiski > > > >>>I should have made it clear that I was using settings posted by I think Komputer >>>Korner for CM6K that had the heading Faber/Pilz for CM6K. Even though it did >>>state they were for CM5x00, I have now playing another 40 games between those >>>settings that were posted and the standard Settings, and those results were even >>>worse over 2 minute games. Even though there are still two games to go out of >>>the 40. Those settings which you say are not for CM6K is about 17 games behind. >>>So I can see why they are not for CM6K. They are just no good for this version. >>> >>>Sorry if I implied that you said they were settings for CM6K. >> >>I guess it was KK who brpought a bit confusion when giving my settings for >>anyone who asks for good settings for CM5500/CM6000. >>That is why I asked to add my and Walter Pilz' settings to the Resource center >>and make significantly clear that they are for CM4000-CM5500. All my games which I mention for this post were played two minutes for each side. My settings for CM6K which I have posted here before over 40/2hr time settings beat the Faber ones, and the Faber ones at that time setting also beat the CM6K standard settings. but I am talking about 2 minutes a side for these games. But tell me if those Faber settings you have win in two minute a side games. if they do then it is very strange, because in total I have played over 300 games against Faber and Standard settings, which at that time setting you can do in a short period of time, and the standard settings win easily. usually by about 10 games in a 40 round tournament. I use a PII 450, 256 Ram and 64med hash. And a 24 meg video card if that plays a part. So at the time level I mention I would be very interested to see what results you come up with. Play a quick 100 round tournament overnight and post the game results.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.