Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 16:16:10 02/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2004 at 17:25:15, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On February 27, 2004 at 15:19:39, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>Started a little contest at G/10 on AMD 950 MHz, so far this is the output: >> >> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >> 1 List512 : 2629 296 207 8 68.8 % 2492 37.5 % >> 2 Ruffian_105 : 2611 360 201 7 64.3 % 2509 42.9 % >> 3 Rebel12_CB : 2601 378 251 7 57.1 % 2551 28.6 % >> 4 Ruffian_210 : 2595 310 249 8 62.5 % 2506 25.0 % >> 5 Ruffian_101 : 2568 310 387 8 62.5 % 2480 0.0 % >> 6 Aristarch 4.41: 2541 325 292 8 56.2 % 2498 12.5 % >> 7 Delfi-440 : 2523 325 292 8 56.2 % 2479 12.5 % >> 8 Gothmog : 2500 251 378 7 42.9 % 2550 28.6 % >> 9 Ruffian_202 : 2485 343 343 7 50.0 % 2485 14.3 % >>10 Glc300 : 2466 343 343 7 50.0 % 2466 14.3 % >>11 DeepSjeng : 2406 207 296 8 31.2 % 2543 37.5 % >>12 Quark-232-net : 2399 249 310 8 37.5 % 2488 25.0 % >>13 ELChinito 3.25: 2392 333 360 7 35.7 % 2494 14.3 % >>14 Crafty-1910 : 2290 270 284 8 25.0 % 2481 25.0 % >> >>Initial indications are that all of the Ruffians are about the same strength. >>But more data may change that appearance significantly. > > >In case you wonder, I think that I might be of some help. You listed almost all >the available versions up there, almost all but one: Ruffian Leiden 2003 BTW, >the version that won the Dutch Open 2003. >And that one is the strongest of all, at least in my testing: more than 5000 >games at different although fast time controls (longest was G/45, played on two >fast machines: P4-2.4 and Athlon 2800+ Tbred). >Of course, I am aware of some other credible data (cf. Sarah Bird, for example) >that point in a different direction. However, none of the testers has done so >much testing with the Leiden version which is simply neglected for reasons >unknown to me. Even the mammoth effort of Leo Dijksman, a person of absolute >integrity, has somehow "missed" to test the Leiden version. Most probably due >to the _unnecessary_ and very much _premature_ hype about Ruffian 2.0.0 (almost >untested by me, at least). > >I am as sure as one can reasonably be that the Leiden version of Ruffian would >perform about 30-40 Elo better than _any_ other version of Ruffian in SSDF >testing and that it should place about as high as CM 9000. > >Djordje Hello Djordje! Can it be the case, that Ruffian 2.0.0 plays not good with the Leiden BOOK? I seems that this book is optimized for Ruffian _leiden but not for Ruffian 2.0 Or? Best, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.