Author: Mridul Muralidharan
Date: 20:19:43 04/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2004 at 18:54:16, Peter Skinner wrote: >On April 29, 2004 at 18:39:11, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I trust more David Omid than you so your results have no value because we have >>no way to know that you use falcon. >> >>It is better if you do not waste time in these tests. >>I do not think that it is going to convince somebody. >> >>Uri > >Surely you don't think Vincent would fake results to try and make Robert look >bad... shame on you :) > >Peter Let us all not talk of "faking data" here ! There were some "incidents" , regarding "faking" that are quiet fresh in my memory even now ... esp regarding parallel search where there was some obvious faking and some not so obvious faking ;) So let us not get into all that now :) Relevence of this statement ? Relates to the "actors" (uml wise i mean) of the above discussion :) Mridul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.