Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:49:24 04/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2004 at 23:19:43, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >On April 29, 2004 at 18:54:16, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On April 29, 2004 at 18:39:11, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>I trust more David Omid than you so your results have no value because we have >>>no way to know that you use falcon. >>> >>>It is better if you do not waste time in these tests. >>>I do not think that it is going to convince somebody. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Surely you don't think Vincent would fake results to try and make Robert look >>bad... shame on you :) >> >>Peter > > >Let us all not talk of "faking data" here ! >There were some "incidents" , regarding "faking" that are quiet fresh in my >memory even now ... esp regarding parallel search where there was some obvious >faking and some not so obvious faking ;) >So let us not get into all that now :) >Relevence of this statement ? Relates to the "actors" (uml wise i mean) of the >above discussion :) > >Mridul I am aware of _no_ faking whatsoever... Do you know something I don't know???
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.