Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 08:01:49 04/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2004 at 07:02:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 29, 2004 at 23:54:37, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On April 29, 2004 at 18:53:07, Peter Skinner wrote: >> >>>On April 29, 2004 at 18:17:54, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>Of course i'll play many games to make it statistical significant in order to >>>>try to proof that crafty is not having a chance against a modern engine like >>>>Falcon. I have a dual K7 upstairs ready for such a match. >>>> >>>>Let me know whether you are interested in taking this proposal. >>>> >>>>Best regards, >>>>Vincent >>> >>>Crafty played some "modern" engines at the last CCT and did quite well, in fact >>>it won the tournament. >>> >>>Seeing how it never had a chance, Bob must have been using a modern engine like >>>Diep.. oh that's right.. you never played.. >>> >>>And as for your comments that Diep is top 3 in the world.. I think Amir, Stefan, >>>Frans, Chrilly.... well really anyone will argue that point :) >>> >>>Why you make such rediculous comments is beyond me. Diep maybe a good engine, >>>but at the World's I am picking it to finish no higher than 5th. >>> >>>Peter >> >>Diep is not as weak as it used to be. It's not top-3 yet, but it's not an >>impossibility either. > >It's definitely top 3. > >Did i ever do such a claim before? > >I remember i didn't even do any top3 claim before world champs >1999,2000,2001,2002,2003. > >Now i do 1 claim and only a few kitchen-experts comment it to be not true :) :-) I'm commenting based upon known results. Yoour own testing (I'm not saying "basement testing" ;-) is not publicly available. So I wait to see what happens at the upcoming WCCC... Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.