Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:02:17 04/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2004 at 23:54:37, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On April 29, 2004 at 18:53:07, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On April 29, 2004 at 18:17:54, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>Of course i'll play many games to make it statistical significant in order to >>>try to proof that crafty is not having a chance against a modern engine like >>>Falcon. I have a dual K7 upstairs ready for such a match. >>> >>>Let me know whether you are interested in taking this proposal. >>> >>>Best regards, >>>Vincent >> >>Crafty played some "modern" engines at the last CCT and did quite well, in fact >>it won the tournament. >> >>Seeing how it never had a chance, Bob must have been using a modern engine like >>Diep.. oh that's right.. you never played.. >> >>And as for your comments that Diep is top 3 in the world.. I think Amir, Stefan, >>Frans, Chrilly.... well really anyone will argue that point :) >> >>Why you make such rediculous comments is beyond me. Diep maybe a good engine, >>but at the World's I am picking it to finish no higher than 5th. >> >>Peter > >Diep is not as weak as it used to be. It's not top-3 yet, but it's not an >impossibility either. It's definitely top 3. Did i ever do such a claim before? I remember i didn't even do any top3 claim before world champs 1999,2000,2001,2002,2003. Now i do 1 claim and only a few kitchen-experts comment it to be not true :) > >Scary stuff! ;-) > >Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.