Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 12:28:36 05/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2004 at 15:14:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 20, 2004 at 15:01:19, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On May 20, 2004 at 14:30:37, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 20, 2004 at 14:20:40, Sune Fischer wrote: >>> >>>>On May 20, 2004 at 13:30:00, John Merlino wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>CM_SKR on an AMD 2500+ also prefers g5, and doesn't think for very long about >>>>>any of the other moves. But then there's a big fail low at depth 14 and it can >>>>>see how the game is going to go all the way up through 28...Be6. The King then >>>>>analyzes 23...Be6 for more than three minutes, but does not see an improvement. >>>>>A further two minutes on b5 finally produces a new move, but it doesn't look >>>>>good for Black: >>>> >>>>CM needs 6 minutes for a positive score for white, >>>>and has +0.32 for white after 11 minutes? >>>> >>>>I'm not saying I like black's position, but judging by the score it certainly >>>>looks pretty even. >>>> >>>>-S. >>> >>>judging by the score it seems that white has a small advantage. >> >>Pretty even doesn't mean 0.00, it means 0.00 +- 0.5 > >No it means 0.00+-0.25 > >0.32 is not pretty even. I disagree. Pretty even means drawish and 0.32 is definitely _not_ a convincing winning score by any definition. >Fritz shows = for 0.25 but + and = behind it for 0.26 >It means that 0.32 is slightly better than pretty even. That's nonsense. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.