Author: Daniel Shawul
Date: 04:49:10 06/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 2004 at 07:37:30, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On June 03, 2004 at 03:21:07, Daniel Shawul wrote: > >>Hi >> >>I used to use adaptive null move pruning. >>But now since i added checks only in the first ply of quiescence search(horizon) >>I think it is time to use R=3 everywhere. Is it safe? >>Do i need to do other safe guard searches like verified null move >>pruning? >> >>best >>daniel > >I use R=3 everywhere (checks in q-search). It is not a pure win though: you see >more in some areas and less in others. > >anthony do you do checks everywhere? Zappa is so fast so i don't think you do it. I tried adaptive null move pruning and pure R=3 in test suites and not much difference. Besides since R=3 for depth > 6 or 8 and it doesn't take much to reach those depths, i see no difference b/n those methods. daniel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.