Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 12:11:30 06/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2004 at 14:59:38, Russell Reagan wrote: >On June 10, 2004 at 14:45:04, Andrew Wagner wrote: > >>I think we >>should stay away from anything that uses PNBRQK within the notation, and shoot >>for as much simplicity as possible. > >As Dan Honeycutt pointed out in the other thread, coordinate notation still >requires NBQR for promotions, ex. e7e8Q. You could go for the "internal" standard: [1]e2[2]e4[3] [1] = Optional, any uppercase letter for readability. [2] = Optional, one of "-" or "x" for readability [3] = Required on pawn promotion, "=" followed by "1" = knight, etc Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.