Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 11:59:38 06/10/04

On June 10, 2004 at 14:45:04, Andrew Wagner wrote:

>I think we
>should stay away from anything that uses PNBRQK within the notation, and shoot
>for as much simplicity as possible.

As Dan Honeycutt pointed out in the other thread, coordinate notation still
requires NBQR for promotions, ex. e7e8Q.

Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Andrew Wagner 12:28:08 06/10/04
Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Dan Honeycutt 12:11:30 06/10/04
Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Jon Dart 12:05:28 06/10/04
- Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Andrew Wagner 12:29:50 06/10/04
  - Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Andreas Guettinger 12:47:35 06/10/04
    - Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Marek Strejczek 13:46:02 06/10/04
      - Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Russell Reagan 15:40:16 06/10/04
        
        This is the point!! Andrew Wagner 17:36:55 06/10/04
        
        Re: This is the point!! Sune Fischer 23:21:49 06/10/04
    - Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Anthony Cozzie 13:43:17 06/10/04
      - Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Andrew Wagner 17:40:15 06/10/04
        
        Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Andrew Wagner 17:41:41 06/10/04
      - Re: Where we've been and where we're going in the discussion on XML Dan Honeycutt 16:51:07 06/10/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.