Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 14:32:23 07/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2004 at 17:22:19, Amir Ban wrote: >On July 06, 2004 at 17:10:06, Andrew Dados wrote: > >>On July 06, 2004 at 16:39:54, Amir Ban wrote: >> >>>On July 06, 2004 at 16:24:59, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>>On July 06, 2004 at 15:58:24, Ingo Althofer wrote: >>>> >>>>>I just found time to replay the games from round 3. >>>>> >>>>>The 27-move win by Junior (with sacrifice of >>>>>pawns and a full knight) is simply marvellous. >>>>>And it was not a win by opening-book preparation! >>>>> >>>>>Congratulations to Amir and Shay! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Ingo Althofer. >>>> >>>>Yes, great game by Junior. However, all the line played by Diep was not good and >>>>Junior had 4 open columns to attack. The 3 pawns of Diep was not a real >>>>advantage. If you put other engines from move 13 to 18, you will realize that >>>>they dont see that the white position is not good. >>>> >>>>So, I dont agree that the opening preparation did not influenced the result. It >>>>helped a lot. Of course, the final Junior was clean and direct. >>>> >>>>By the way, just one game. We will see tomorrow.... >>>> >>>>Regards, Arturo Ochoa M. >>> >>>It was just a QGA with slight white advantage. >>> >>>Is there anybody else who plays either 18... Rae8 or 20... Bxc5 ? >>> >>>Amir >> >>While watching the game at playchess I noticed evaluations and plycounts added >>in movelist for black (Junior). Plycounts suggested there were real Junior >>numbers from that game - correct me if I am wrong here. >> > >The moves were relayed by Junior, so you are not wrong. > > >>Anyhow if those numbers are from real game then Junior had thought position was >>better for white till move 22 and thought 0.00 at move 23... Re5 (4 moves prior >>to white resigning!) >> > >It had given three pawns at that point, so a 0 score is as significant as +3 >with level material. I can't understand ?!?! Do you say that if Junior is 2 Pawns behind and it has an evaluation of 0.00 then it thinks it has the advantage by +2.00 ? I thought the evaluations were absolute and a 0.00 is a draw no matter what is the material difference.... > > >>IMO it was quite a lucky line for black, resulting in beautiful minature here. >> > >I don't see where luck comes in here. No luck at all! I can't understand what luck has to do with Chess. Only the opening book choice is a factor of luck but in this game there was no advantage for Junior after the opening. It was just the well known style of Junior. Please keep working this way. The style of Junior is amazing. Don't change it.......... > >Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.