Author: Tim Foden
Date: 14:13:13 07/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2004 at 16:57:44, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On July 27, 2004 at 16:51:02, Tim Foden wrote: > >[snip] > >>>Hey how come 8.Qc5+ came? ! >>>Its not even a legal move, how come your engine incured it? ! >> >>after >> >>1. Nf5 Qb1+ 2. Kf2 Bh4+ 3. Qxh4 fxe3+ 4. Ke2 Bf3+ 5. gxf3 Qe1+ >>6. Qxe1 exd2 7. Qg1+ Kf8 >> >>we get this position: >> >>[d]5k1r/5p1p/p7/Pp2pN2/8/5P2/2PpK2P/6Q1 w - - 2 8 >> >>Qc5+ looks legal to me here. >> >>Cheers, Tim. > >But do you admit that you were at least slightly worried when you first read his >post? :) > >Sargon Yes you're right, I was a bit worried... ... but if it really was a bug, in some way pleased as well, as concrete bugs like illegal moves are generally not too hard to track down! :) Cheers, Tim.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.