Author: Gopikrishna
Date: 15:10:02 07/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2004 at 17:13:13, Tim Foden wrote: >On July 27, 2004 at 16:57:44, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On July 27, 2004 at 16:51:02, Tim Foden wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>>>Hey how come 8.Qc5+ came? ! >>>>Its not even a legal move, how come your engine incured it? ! >>> >>>after >>> >>>1. Nf5 Qb1+ 2. Kf2 Bh4+ 3. Qxh4 fxe3+ 4. Ke2 Bf3+ 5. gxf3 Qe1+ >>>6. Qxe1 exd2 7. Qg1+ Kf8 >>> >>>we get this position: >>> >>>[d]5k1r/5p1p/p7/Pp2pN2/8/5P2/2PpK2P/6Q1 w - - 2 8 >>> >>>Qc5+ looks legal to me here. >>> >>>Cheers, Tim. >> >>But do you admit that you were at least slightly worried when you first read his >>post? :) >> >>Sargon > >Yes you're right, I was a bit worried... > >... but if it really was a bug, in some way pleased as well, as concrete bugs >like illegal moves are generally not too hard to track down! :) > >Cheers, Tim. Yes sorry I just made a mistake :) No need to worry your moves are all perfect :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.