Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 10:52:11 08/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2004 at 13:16:03, Charles Roberson wrote: > > > How are you calling see. v = -see() or v = see() or v = piece + see .....? > > Your code (from previous post) isn't as mine but that could be in how you > call see. Also, my attempts at see are slower than my other methods. It > seems best to selectively use see in the main search and maybe the qsearch > as well. > > As stated by Tony, -8000 sounds like pawn-queen. So the issue could > be a combination of the function and how you call it. > > > So, how are you calling see? > > Charles Just as in Alessandro's variant 1 and 2 examples. Also, I went back in and found a bug I had introduced into Alessandro's code. When that was fixed, see() started working. But there is no improvement in the search. See recent newer thread for interesting input from Dan. Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.