Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: c,c++5,c#.

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 13:19:06 08/12/04

On August 12, 2004 at 16:11:04, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>A good C++ program cannot run faster than a good C program doing same thing.
>Just like a good C program cannot run faster than a good Assembly program doing
>same thing.

Theoretically true. Practically false.

>Although it is possible to write C++ code that is just as fast as C, there are
>more pitfalls. Quoting Peter van der Linden (author of the famous "Expert C
>Programming" book): "[In C++] the original C philosophy of 'no features that
>need invisible runtime support' has been compromised."

Re: c,c++5,c#. Anthony Cozzie 14:12:38 08/12/04
- Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 18:04:51 08/12/04
  - Re: c,c++5,c#. Omid David Tabibi 18:35:28 08/12/04
    - Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 21:47:17 08/12/04
      - Re: c,c++5,c#. Omid David Tabibi 02:10:59 08/13/04
        
        Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 06:53:29 08/13/04
        
        Re: c,c++5,c#. Anthony Cozzie 08:50:13 08/13/04
        
        Re: c,c++5,c#. Russell Reagan 12:06:00 08/13/04
        
        Re: c,c++5,c#. Peter Fendrich 12:31:12 08/13/04
        
        Re: c,c++5,c#. Per Steneskog 05:32:18 08/13/04
        
        Re: c,c++5,c#. Omid David Tabibi 06:02:30 08/13/04
        
        Re: c,c++5,c#. Per Steneskog 06:11:41 08/13/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.