Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 16:12:51 09/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2004 at 18:58:52, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On September 05, 2004 at 18:44:08, Stuart Cracraft wrote: > >>On September 05, 2004 at 17:37:05, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 05, 2004 at 17:02:19, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Uri, >>>> >>>>The result before, with quiescence calling main search with depth=1 >>>>if quiescence is entered in check: >>>> >>>>**** 6.79/28.10 79% 238/300 249.14 73882192 246274/1/296554 0/870213/1477262/517 >>>>893/17740646/101795 >>>> >>>>The result if quiescence just does the search itself: >>>> >>>>**** 7.04/17.52 72% 216/300 260.43 72459680 241532/1/278229 0/542677/1438068/602 >>>>049/29312072/2159 >>>> >>>>There is much in the main search (extensions, null move, hashing) that is not >>>>in the quiescence and those techniques are a big benefit for the former method >>>>for me. >>>> >>>>Stuart >>> >>>I do not believe it and you probably have a bug in your new qsearch. >>> >>>I use no hash in the qsearch but first check in the qsearch was a clear >>>advantage for me in the qsearch was an advantage for me. >>> >>>I can add that I get 282/300 in less than one second on WAC with P1000. >>>I used wacnew and I wonder if you used a different test. >> >>I do not know about wacnew. Can you post a copy? >> >>> >>>For example I wonder if you have bm Qxa8 d6 dxe6 g3 for position 31 >> >>I don't have g3!!!! >> >>> >>> >>>Here are results of movei in the first positions(number of nodes to solve the >>>position because time is not interesting: >>>position 1 2106 nodes >>>position 2 not solved >>>position 3 1215 nodes >>>position 4 105 nodes >>>position 5 47 nodes >>>position 6 105 nodes >>>position 7 175 nodes >>>position 8 335 nodes >>>position 9 86 nodes >>>position 10 89 nodes >>>position 11 191 nodes >>>position 12 65 nodes >>>position 13 117 nodes >>>position 14 142 nodes >>>position 15 74 nodes >>>position 16 393 nodes >>>position 17 387 nodes >>>position 18 2548 nodes >>>position 19 449 nodes >>>position 20 113 nodes >>>position 21 11308 nodes >>>position 22 426 nodes >>>position 23 15377 nodes >>>position 24 264 nodes >>>position 25 112 nodes >>>position 26 341 nodes >>>position 27 212 nodes >>>position 28 131 nodes >>>position 29 7506 nodes >>>position 30 21064 nodes >>>position 31 59 nodes >> >>Stuart > >Is movei commercial? Do you share code? > >I picked up wacnew.epd at > > ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/EPD/wacnew.epd > >but had to ftp it via anonymous ftp as it >blocked my Internet Explorer attempts to obtain. > >Testing with it now. > >Stuart wacold **** 6.78/23.72 79% 237/300 252.15 72139712 240466/1/286098 0/855071/393524/1595 397/17717384/62606 wacnew **** 6.80/23.83 80% 240/300 250.67 73082144 243607/1/291553 0/871282/397085/1606 781/18010090/63447 Having problems getting above the 79%-80% mark. Been stuck there for a week or two. Not many ideas lately. Up from 65% result in June when it was 2-3 months old, before ICDers got a hold of it. Not sure where to squeeze out additional advances. Since I don't analyze any specific position, excepting WAC 141 going forward is not as easy. I know that WAC 2 could be rewarded with connected passed pawns on 6th rank evaluation term being worth a high quantity. Perhaps I will just analyze the failures now and can gain insight. Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.