Author: Charles Roberson
Date: 08:17:35 09/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
This discussion brings out an interesting thought. I agree with all of Bob's statements, but how about a change of use? Lets assume a single stage cache and replacement scheme of current depth > previous depth. Also, we have a collision test to ensure we really are on the same position. Now, the PV is set but in a later tree branch one of the PV positions is overwritten due to greater search. True this changes the PV from what you originally setup but there may be a positive side effect of this. If we only allow the last few moves of the PV to be changed by hash replacement(I can think of two ways to do this) then wouldn't we get better moves for the PV tail? Thus, improve move ordering for the next iteration due to a somewhat better PV? Charles
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.