Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:50:32 10/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2004 at 00:55:06, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: >I would never consider Kasparov , Kramnik as the best Anticomputer players (No >doubt they are in the top 3 players in the world right now but they are not Anti >Computer Chess Experts. > >The best Anticomputer player is the one who gets the silicon monster to play the >positions in which its evaluations are not realistic and where it feels >uncomfortable. The one who gets the computers to play such positions most often >can be considered as Anti-computer expert. Rarely do we find Humans outplaying >Computers in Tactics so Depth is not a biggest factor here. The main advantage from bigger depth is better positional moves and not tactics. Tell computers to change their mind only if they find something that is at least 0.5 pawn better than the move they suggest at depth 1 and I believe they will not be even at master level. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.