Author: Günther Simon
Date: 07:51:25 10/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2004 at 10:35:35, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On October 27, 2004 at 10:09:48, Uri Blass wrote: > >[snip] > >>Baron got only depth 5 in 41 seconds and it is not the only case(it happened >>also at move 19 with 21 seconds). >> >>I think that maybe it is better if programmers tell their program to refuse to >>play if they do not get enough nodes per second when the user may choose the >>minimal number of nodes per second based on the speed of his computer. >> >>I think to make minimal number of nodes per second as a parameter and probably >>suggest to set it as 1/2 of the number of nodes per second that the program get >>in the opening position. >> >>In case that the program does not get enough nodes per second it will refuse to >>play and report game aborted by insufficient number of nodes. >> > >What are typical reasons for such misbehaviours? Based on the posts here in CCC, >these things happen quite frequently. > >The suggestion above though sounds like "rebooting Windows if something's wrong" >or "the doctor giving you cough syrup if she doesn't have a clue what's wrong". >Hardly something I'd call a solution. > >Sargon They only happen frequently for always the same people... Guenther
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.