Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fidelity Designer 2100 has a very primitive evaluation function

Author: Dana Turnmire

Date: 16:29:47 12/04/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 04, 2004 at 19:06:34, Steve B wrote:

>  Are
>>all dedicated units that weak?
>
>well it is not really fair to compare any dedicated unit to a PC..even those
>dedicated units 2300-2400 ELO
>however no of course not all dedicated units will preform as poorly as the
>Designer 2100
>
>if we want to stay just within the Fidelity Designer Series we have the Designer
>Mach III Master which was rated 2265(USCF) OR even better the Designer Mach IV
>rated 2325 USCF
>both computers would do far better then the 2100
>what you have there is basically the Par Program
>
>in another thread i posted a position which the Mach III solved instantaneously
>
>how long does it take your Designer 2100 to find N-G3+  in this position?
>
>
>[D] 8/6k1/1P1p2p1/3Ppn2/3q4/8/6PP/rR2QB1K b - - 0 1
>
> i am betting somewhat much longer then.. instantaneously
>Steve

Hi Steve,

I have had several dedicated units in the past (Tandy 1650, Novag Forte, Novag
Diablo, Radio Shack 2250XL) and have never had any problem setting up a position
from scratch with those that allowed it but the Fidelity is so user unfriendly
to me I gave up trying to set up such positions.  You wouldn't have the whole
score would you?  I may break the manual out again and give it a try.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.