Author: Christopher Conkie
Date: 19:27:58 12/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hello Peter, I will my opinion toward the title of this post later and how it relates to your current hotheadedness. First of all.... Thu 18/11/2004 12:43 GMT Thu 18/11/2004 19:24 GMT Thu 18/11/2004 19:43 GMT Thu 18/11/2004 23:33 GMT Thu 18/11/2004 23:43 GMT Mean anything to you? >The discussion resumed here and I was told to "Send an email. They are cheap and >quick". So I did. 5 in fact. And have recieved no response. I sent them to both >Frank and Chris. Not one of them has replied. These are the times of my emails that were sent to you. Shall I pin them all here now? Shall we add liar to your list of misdeameanours? Your password is disabled once again because you steadfastly refuse to behave in a sane and rational manner. You post Off Topic all the time. OT is the search here along with your name to get just a few examples of you in action. What happened to this kind of Peter.....(last paragraph by the way) http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=143575 And then that brings me round to this kind of Peter..... http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=272635 I cannot comment on what you have done in a certain way, as it is not my area of remit but I have an opinion.... Here it is for what it is worth.... I would remove it Peter. If I were you I would remove it. It is one of the most important works in computer chess in the last 5 years. It is owned by someone. They choose how their work is distributed and where. Not you. That is my opinion. Now we wait for Richard again. I have no doubt that all viewers of your unilateral actions are in no doubt about the difference between permission and theft. I do not wish a conversation now and here with you. I have more important things to do. Christopher
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.