Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 23:24:59 12/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2004 at 02:04:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On December 12, 2004 at 01:07:05, Peter Skinner wrote: > >If you add 1 more rule people might take you even serious and that's >in case of a big dispute the players meeting decides. > >Where players meeting means every participant has 1 vote. > >By the way at that dual opteron that plays at fics, some other processes are >running eating more than 1 cpu, swapping out DIEP, and the book reduces playing >strength with a 1000 points i bet. > >16571 ralph 25 0 92832 24m 84m R 99.9 0.8 5973:11 kdeinit > >As you see it runs 5973 hours already. > >We will see how strong Gandalf is at Paderborn 2005 where some serious level >gets played with serious tournament books. > >People usually overrate programs which are hyper agressive. Hydra being best >example. It joins in Paderborn2005 though as it's on the participants list. > >Note that Gandalf always was a good blitz program, with a good book capable of >winning any blitz event. > >Vincent > What does FICS and Paderbourn2005 have to do with the CCT? Am I missing something? And what isn't serious about my offer? Would you like to TD the CCT? If you look at the rules that are not much different that the ones that Volker used. So how is he serious, and I am not? Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.