Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 06:28:47 12/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2004 at 09:01:13, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 31, 2004 at 08:40:48, stuart taylor wrote: > >>So much for those who attacked me for taken for granted that Shredder 7.04 was >>still better than Shredder 8.0. This ssdf rating shows Shredder 7.04 to still be >>stronger even than Shredder 8.0. >>I felt SUCH a fool when people here told me I don't know what I'm talking about! >>Anyway, so now I'm a bit relieved. But I'm still interested if anyone has >>information from other rating lists or whatever that Shredder 8.0 is in fact >>stronger. But ssdf is NOT saying that! >>S.Taylor > >I do not see it. > >I see that shredder8 inspite of being handicapped by the chessbase >interface(shredder is faster in the classic interface) has 1 elo better than >shredder7.04 > >Note that Junior and Fritz and Hiarcs are probably also handicapped by the >chessbase interface and I guess that they could get better rating without that >stupid interface. You say stupid the Chessbase(Fritz/Shredder/Junior...) interface, because you(or others) believe (or suspect) that it's slow down programs......? > >I also remember claims that Shredder8 under chessbase is handicapped by inferior >book and not only by being slower. I am aware of the worse book, but as i remember the speed loss is meaningless. But i may be wrong. Do you remember any % number? > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.