Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: So much for those who attacked me re. Shr. 7.04, 8.0 etc.

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 15:19:11 12/31/04

Go up one level in this thread


On December 31, 2004 at 16:31:37, Tanya Deborah wrote:

>On December 31, 2004 at 09:01:13, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On December 31, 2004 at 08:40:48, stuart taylor wrote:
>>
>>>So much for those who attacked me for taken for granted that Shredder 7.04 was
>>>still better than Shredder 8.0. This ssdf rating shows Shredder 7.04 to still be
>>>stronger even than Shredder 8.0.
>>>I felt SUCH a fool when people here told me I don't know what I'm talking about!
>>>Anyway, so now I'm a bit relieved. But I'm still interested if anyone has
>>>information from other rating lists or whatever that Shredder 8.0 is in fact
>>>stronger. But ssdf is NOT saying that!
>>>S.Taylor
>>
>>I do not see it.
>>
>>I see that shredder8 inspite of being handicapped by the chessbase
>>interface(shredder is faster in the classic interface) has 1 elo better than
>>shredder7.04
>>
>>Note that Junior and Fritz and Hiarcs are probably also handicapped by the
>>chessbase interface and I guess that they could get better rating without that
>>stupid interface.
>>
>
>Hello Uri
>
>Why you said : stupid interface Uri ?????
>
>What do you mean with that?
>
>Tanya.

Hello Tanya

I meant that the interface of chessbase makes shredder slower relative to the
UCI interface.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.