Author: Mike Hood
Date: 15:45:53 01/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2004 at 18:19:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 31, 2004 at 16:31:37, Tanya Deborah wrote: > >>On December 31, 2004 at 09:01:13, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 31, 2004 at 08:40:48, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>So much for those who attacked me for taken for granted that Shredder 7.04 was >>>>still better than Shredder 8.0. This ssdf rating shows Shredder 7.04 to still be >>>>stronger even than Shredder 8.0. >>>>I felt SUCH a fool when people here told me I don't know what I'm talking about! >>>>Anyway, so now I'm a bit relieved. But I'm still interested if anyone has >>>>information from other rating lists or whatever that Shredder 8.0 is in fact >>>>stronger. But ssdf is NOT saying that! >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>I do not see it. >>> >>>I see that shredder8 inspite of being handicapped by the chessbase >>>interface(shredder is faster in the classic interface) has 1 elo better than >>>shredder7.04 >>> >>>Note that Junior and Fritz and Hiarcs are probably also handicapped by the >>>chessbase interface and I guess that they could get better rating without that >>>stupid interface. >>> >> >>Hello Uri >> >>Why you said : stupid interface Uri ????? >> >>What do you mean with that? >> >>Tanya. > >Hello Tanya > >I meant that the interface of chessbase makes shredder slower relative to the >UCI interface. > >Uri That's the first time I've heard this claim made, Uri. Are there any tests to back this up? My own experiences give me the impression that native Chessbase engines run faster than their native UCI equivalents INSIDE THE CHESSBASE GUI, but I've never compared Chessbase engines with UCI engines running in Arena. I would be glad to receive further information.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.