Author: Peter Berger
Date: 09:21:50 01/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2004 at 07:51:37, Thoralf Karlsson wrote:
> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2004-12-31 100049 games played by 267 computers
> Rating + - Games Won Oppo
> ------ --- --- ----- --- ----
> 1 Shredder 8.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2805 23 -22 1075 71% 2645
> 2 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2804 23 -22 1041 70% 2653
> 3 Deep Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2791 25 -24 896 72% 2628
Two thoughts:
a.) I was surprised how close Shredder and Fritz actually are - in fact too
close to call.
THE SSDF RATING LIST 2004-04-22 97872 games played by 264 computers
Rating + - Games Won Oppo
------ --- --- ----- --- ----
1 Shredder 8.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2818 34 -32 481 70% 2673
2 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2809 24 -23 967 71% 2648
3 Deep Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2790 26 -25 855 72% 2625
b.) The major change to the previous list is that Shredder 8 had to play some
lower-rated opponents which hurt its performance. It's interesting to compair
the average rating of the opponents anyway. There is a slight tendency for a
higher average rating of the opponents to result in a higher final rating for an
entry. Maybe there is some rating incest going one here? Maybe choice of
opponents has a too strong influence.
Just some thoughts - no criticism intended.
Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.