Author: Graham Banks
Date: 10:56:11 01/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2005 at 12:21:50, Peter Berger wrote: >On December 31, 2004 at 07:51:37, Thoralf Karlsson wrote: > >> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2004-12-31 100049 games played by 267 computers >> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >> 1 Shredder 8.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2805 23 -22 1075 71% 2645 >> 2 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2804 23 -22 1041 70% 2653 >> 3 Deep Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2791 25 -24 896 72% 2628 > >Two thoughts: > >a.) I was surprised how close Shredder and Fritz actually are - in fact too >close to call. > >THE SSDF RATING LIST 2004-04-22 97872 games played by 264 computers > Rating + - Games Won Oppo > ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- > 1 Shredder 8.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2818 34 -32 481 70% 2673 > 2 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2809 24 -23 967 71% 2648 > 3 Deep Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2790 26 -25 855 72% 2625 > > >b.) The major change to the previous list is that Shredder 8 had to play some >lower-rated opponents which hurt its performance. It's interesting to compair >the average rating of the opponents anyway. There is a slight tendency for a >higher average rating of the opponents to result in a higher final rating for an >entry. Maybe there is some rating incest going one here? Maybe choice of >opponents has a too strong influence. > > >Just some thoughts - no criticism intended. > >Peter I'm pretty sure that Fritz 8 Bilbao is even stronger than Deep Fritz 8 which throws an even more interesting factor into the equation! Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.