Author: Helcio Alexandre Pacheco
Date: 13:57:31 01/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 1999 at 14:56:23, Will Singleton wrote: > >On January 21, 1999 at 12:35:01, Helcio Alexandre Pacheco wrote: > > .... > >I have contacted speedtrap, but I really don't care about that aspect anymore. >My focus has changed on this. > >I'm asking, theoretically, can anyone look at the opening and middlegames >presented here and find an example of a demonstrably inferior move? Are these >games the product of a strong computer or a strong human player? Is it possible >to make that determination? I think so, given the other circumstances. > >Awhile back we had a poll question on whether a GM could tell he was up against >a computer. Most thought he could, after only a few games. How about you guys? > >btw, C++ isn't my idea of an interesting discussion. :) > >Will Hi Will, I had the experience to play in ICC against a guest that after a few games I realised that was a computer. We started playing 1 0 games and he was beating me with very deep tatics. I tried to outplay him taticaly too, playing very sharp gambits and he was refuting all and very fast! When the scored was 5-0 a light came to my mind and I played David Levy Opening and bang!!! I was playing a crafty clone... The game went through 150 moves, and, of course, I won on time (although crafty can play a game in less then a sec...:), after moving the same piece a hundred times (don't try this at home ;). btw, C++ isn't my idea of an interesting discussion either ;) But some post ago they were talking about PL/I ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.