Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Bionic vs Crafty, once again

Author: Johan Havegheer

Date: 15:16:45 01/23/99

Go up one level in this thread


On January 23, 1999 at 10:52:02, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On January 23, 1999 at 10:12:36, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:
>
>>On January 23, 1999 at 00:07:11, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>>
>>>Isn't Bionic Impakt  Crafty?  Does anybody know what changes have been made to
>>>the program in order to distinguish it from the original Crafty?
>>>
>>>bruce
>>
>>I have been asked by Frank Quisinsky to translate his statement regarding Bionic
>>Impakt.  Here it is:
>>
>>"Persönlich habe ich mich beim Dutch Open 98 (Bionic Impakt wurde dritter)
>>sehr lange mit Hans Secelle (Programmerer) unterhalten welcher mir
>>versicherte, das Bionic kein Crafty ist. Bionic Impakt beruht zwar auf dem
>>Source Code von Crafty (Version 9.26 und 15.20), jedoch wurde das Programm vor
>>einem Jahr völlig neu überarbeitet. Ferner hat Hans seine eigenen entwickelten
>>Ideen implementiert. Unter anderem sind die Bewertungsfunktionen, wie  z. B.
>>Figurenfelder, Angriffsheuristiken, Bewertung an der Wurzel als auch das
>>Eröffnungsbuch und dessen Zeitkontrollen von Bionic übernommen wurden.
>>Persönlich schätzt Hans die taktischen Fähigkeiten gegenüber Crafty etwas
>>schlechter und die positionellen etwas stärker ein. Als Beweis dient hier
>>z.B. der LCT II Test welcher, völlig unterschiedliche Ergebnisse im Vergleich
>>zu Crafty aufzeigt. Ich habe das überprüft und Bionic hat wirklich nichts
>>mit Crafty gemeinsam."
>>
>>I spent lots of time with Hans Secelle during the Dutch Open 98 (Bionic placed
>>third) trying to make sure that Bionic is not Crafty.  Bionic is based on
>>Crafty's source code (versions 9.26 and 15.20) but the program was completely
>>rewritten, which took a year.  Furthermore, Hans implemented his own, original
>>ideas. Among others, the new evaluation functions such as piece squares, attack
>>heuristics, root-evals, as well as the opening book and time controls that were
>>taken over from Bionic [I presume the previous version of Bionic that had been
>>around for quite some time, say since 1991, Dj.V.]. Hans estimates that the
>>tactical abilities of Bionic are not on a par with Crafty, while its positional
>>play is somewhat better. The LCTII test can be used as evidence for this, as it
>>gives completely different scores when compared with Crafty.  I have checked
>>this out and Crafty and Bionic have really nothing in common.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Djordje
>
>
>This is wrong.  The version of bionic that playedin the first 1/2 of the
>Dutch tournament matched crafty _exactly_.  Every move of every game except
>for 1 or 2.
>
>But that isn't nearly so important as one key thing they 'get'... that being
>a parallel search that no one else has.  Which gives them a 2x-3x speed boost
>over everyone else.  So to say 'it isn't crafty' is baloney.  A few eval changes
>don't make a new program.  I've also pointed out that anybody that takes the
>crafty source is _required_ to make that source public as part of the freeware
>project.   They've never done this.  IE I'd like to see a source version
>released that will _exactly_ match the Dutch tourney moves.  _then_ we could
>_know_ what is different.  They were going to do this, supposedly.  But nothing
>has been done.

There !!! never !!! has been a change in the program version during the dutch
championship. Hans gived me a copy of Bionic on the last day and i did some
tests to prove that Bionic IS CERTAINLY different from Crafty.
I took the first 15 positions off the CCC III tests. (downloaded from the
rebel site). Here are the results :

AMD-K6-2-300 64Mb SDRAM
3min/move

	Bionic Impakt 			Crafty 15.20
Testnr	Move 	Score	Depth	Move	Score	Depth
1	Bd3	0,57	11	Re1	0,31	11
2	Nd4	0,21	11	Re3	-0,06	11
3	Qc2	-0,07	10	Qc2	-0,25	10
4	Bh6	0,07	11	Bh6	0,22	12
5	dxe6	-0,54	11	Kh1	-0,66	11
6	h5	-1,78	11	h5	-1,56	11
7	…Kh7	0,56	10	…Kh7	0,53	10
8	…b5	-0,54	11	…b5	-0,24	10
9	…Qe7	0,95	11	…Qe7	0,57	12
10	…Ne5	-0,32	10	…Re8	0,07	10
11	d5	0,64	10	Bg5	0,48	9
12	e6	0,56	12	e6	0,51	11
13	Ng3	-1,62	9	Ne7+	-1,51	10
14	Nxf5!	-0,58	11	Rxe8+	-1,81	10
15	Ne5	0,54	11	b3	0,28	11

Bionic plays another move than Crafty in 8 testes on 15 !!!!
Sorry for my rather weak English.

Johan Havegheer (Bionic test team)



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.