Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: First ... results are always better

Author: pavel

Date: 08:55:17 02/02/05

Go up one level in this thread


On February 02, 2005 at 11:04:44, Steve Maughan wrote:

>Uri,
>
>>I do not think that 30 elo is a huge step forward.
>
>IMO 30 ELO is significant at the level of Shredder.  But I would also say that I
>consider a 30 ELO improvement the minimum for a release.
>
>>I do not say that it is bad but I saw bigger improvements(see the improvement
>>in fruit that is more than 200 elo in less than a year from fruit1 to fruit2).
>
>IMO there is no way that you can reasonably compare the improvement of Fruit 1
>to Fruit 2 with that of Shredder 9.  They play in a different league.  Don't get
>me wrong - I'm a great fan of Fruit.
>
>Steve


For instance, its very much unlikely that fruit3 will be 200elo better than
fruit2 in less than a year; because of the level of chess fruit2 is playing
right now.

pavs



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.