Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 14:05:30 02/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2005 at 16:47:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 02, 2005 at 15:25:29, Ingo Bauer wrote: > >>>>After one day you may have a couple of hundred, maybe thousand games at 3 0 at >>>>playchess. Unfortunately this is completly worthless for Shredder! I tried there >>>>with two different accounts (both S9). One is playing only games with an hour or >>>>longer, the other run 2 nights only 3 to 5 min no increments. Both on the same >>>>Hardware. The difference at the end was about 100 points. Of course the long >>>>game account is much better! >>>> >>>>Bye >>>>Ingo >>>> >>>>PS: Both account did not play versus other Shredders! >>> >>>I do not understand how do you compare between different time controls. >>> >>>You can say that you cannot learn from blitz about long time control but the >>>knowledge if the new version is better at blitz is also an interesting >>>information. >> >>All I wanted to say is >> >>1. that Shredder needs some time to let the search algorith settle. >>2. On playchess the vast majority of games is 3 0 and therefore a bit unlucky >>for Shredder to show it's real strength. >> >>Bye >>Ingo > >If I understand correctly you mean to say that the difference between Shredder9 >and older version was bigger at longer time control. Why are you making it so complicated? All I wanted to say is that expecting a "real" value out of some blitz games at playchess within one day is impossible. I am sure that most here did understand that quite well after my first post. Why you didnt is beyond my imagination. Sorry for the inconvienience I gave you Ingo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.