Author: Steffen Jakob
Date: 11:33:51 02/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2005 at 14:06:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On February 10, 2005 at 13:40:04, Joshua Haglund wrote: > >>Can anyone tell me if Squash kibitzes too much or too little? >> >>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 7 nodes: 1.78m eval: 0.03 time: 4.49 >>Squash(C) kibitzes: move g2g4 >> >>follow Squash >> >>Joshua Haglund >>toneewa@yahoo.com > >Most people output what you have, but with the entire PV. Zappa does score + >nps + depth + PV. Only the Australian programmers kibitz the entire contents of >the hash table every move. What is a bit confusing is that some engines show the score from whites point of view and some from the engines side. Last CCT I asked in every game which variant my opponent used. Therefore I personally switched to this one: tellics kibitz score=white by 0.01, depth=11, nps=271043 tellics kibitz pv=1... f8c5 2.f1b5 g8e7 3.c3 d5 4.f3xe5 d5xe4 5.b5xc6 e7xc6 6.e5xc6 b7xc6 7.d4 tellics kibitz expected move=f1b5 or tellics kibitz score=black mates in 21, depth=44, nps=13404, egtb-probes=2165 tellics kibitz pv=1... a1h1 2.a7a8 tellics kibitz expected move=a7a8 Greetings, Steffen.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.