Author: Joshua Haglund
Date: 12:35:35 02/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2005 at 14:33:51, Steffen Jakob wrote: >On February 10, 2005 at 14:06:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>On February 10, 2005 at 13:40:04, Joshua Haglund wrote: >> >>>Can anyone tell me if Squash kibitzes too much or too little? >>> >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 7 nodes: 1.78m eval: 0.03 time: 4.49 >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: move g2g4 >>> >>>follow Squash >>> >>>Joshua Haglund >>>toneewa@yahoo.com >> >>Most people output what you have, but with the entire PV. Zappa does score + >>nps + depth + PV. Only the Australian programmers kibitz the entire contents of >>the hash table every move. > >What is a bit confusing is that some engines show the score from whites point of >view and some from the engines side. Last CCT I asked in every game which >variant my opponent used. Therefore I personally switched to this one: > >tellics kibitz score=white by 0.01, depth=11, nps=271043 >tellics kibitz pv=1... f8c5 2.f1b5 g8e7 3.c3 d5 4.f3xe5 d5xe4 5.b5xc6 e7xc6 >6.e5xc6 b7xc6 7.d4 >tellics kibitz expected move=f1b5 > >or > >tellics kibitz score=black mates in 21, depth=44, nps=13404, egtb-probes=2165 >tellics kibitz pv=1... a1h1 2.a7a8 >tellics kibitz expected move=a7a8 > >Greetings, >Steffen. Thanks for the examples. Joshua Haglund toneewa@yahoo.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.